Monday, 09 January 2012 03:07pm | |
The
Malaysian Bar welcomes the decision of the High Court in acquitting
Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The principles of natural justice call for
nothing less, in light of the grave concerns over whether the accused’s
right to a fair trial was preserved.
Based
on news reports of the trial, it is clear that the High Court decision
is in accord with the evidence for, amongst others, the following
reasons:
(1) The
lack of full disclosure: Both prior to and during the trial itself, the
legal team for the defence was denied access to certain documents and
physical evidence in the possession of the prosecution, which
disadvantaged the accused in the preparation of his defence.
(2) Unreliable
DNA evidence: There were obvious concerns that the DNA sample submitted
as evidence was unreliable or may have been compromised.
(3) Certain unusual findings during the trial proceedings:
(4) The
unrefuted relationship between the complainant and a member of the
prosecution team, which raised serious questions whether the complainant
had access to investigation papers, which would have enabled him to
tailor his evidence at trial.
The
charge against Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, which is based on an archaic
provision of the Penal Code that criminalises consensual sexual
relations between adults, should never have been brought. The case has
unnecessarily taken up judicial time and public funds.
[The
Malaysian Bar hopes that the Attorney General would not pursue any
appeal, and will instead focus the valuable resources of the Attorney
General’s Chambers on more serious crimes-???]
Lim Chee Wee
President
Malaysian Bar
9 January 2012
|